%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2017-03-13T12:43:58-04:00
2017-03-13T12:43:58-04:00
2017-03-13T12:43:58-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 15.0
application/pdf
Note: Decisions of a three-justice panel are not to be considered as precedent before any tribunal
uuid:c48e6110-abf2-428d-9216-3cdf0c251f3f
uuid:7f05059b-cfe2-46bf-b4f0-e5f4ba3019b4
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
21 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(Note: Decisions of a three-justice panel are not to be considered as pre\
cedent before any tribunal)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///C/Users/acamp/Documents/MHT/eo04-368.htm)Tj
21.746 0 Td
([3/13/2017 12:43:58 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
/CS0 cs 1 scn
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 scn
/TT1 1 Tf
10.5 0 0 10.5 16 751.5 Tm
(Note:)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
(Decisions of a three-justice panel are )Tj
17.996 0 Td
(not to be considered as precedent before any tribunal.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
/Span<>> BDC
-17.996 -0.929 Td
( )Tj
EMC
/Span<>> BDC
11.25 0 0 11.25 16 731.25 Tm
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(ENTRY ORDER)Tj
ET
/CS0 CS 0 SCN
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 196 730.5 cm
0 0 m
82.82 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
/Span<>> BDC
11.25 0 0 11.25 16 720.75 Tm
( )Tj
EMC
/Span<>> BDC
0 -0.933 TD
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
(SUPREME COURT )Tj
(DOCKET NO. )Tj
(2004-368)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
0 -0.933 TD
( )Tj
EMC
/Span<>> BDC
0 -0.933 TD
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
(FEBRUARY TERM, 2005)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
T*
( )Tj
EMC
/Span<>> BDC
0 -0.933 TD
( )Tj
EMC
0 -0.933 TD
(In re Appeal of Paul )Tj
8.358 0 Td
(and Margaret Irons)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
(})Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
(APPEALED FROM:)Tj
12.442 -0.933 Td
(})Tj
0 -0.933 TD
(})Tj
/Span<>> BDC
-20.8 -0.933 Td
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( \
)Tj
EMC
( )Tj
(})Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
(Environmental Court)Tj
20.8 -0.933 Td
(})Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
/Span<>> BDC
-20.8 -0.933 Td
( \
)Tj
EMC
( )Tj
(})Tj
20.8 -0.933 Td
(})Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
(DOCKET NO. )Tj
(94-6-04 Vtec)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
-20.8 -0.933 Td
( )Tj
EMC
24.067 -0.933 Td
(Trial Judge:)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
4.804 0 Td
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
(Merideth Wright)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
-28.871 -0.933 Td
( )Tj
EMC
/Span<>> BDC
0 -0.933 TD
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
(In the above-entitled cause, the Clerk will enter:)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
0 -0.933 TD
( )Tj
EMC
2.667 -0.933 Td
(Appellants Paul and Margaret Irons )Tj
14.524 0 Td
(challenge an order of the environmental court granting the City of Barre\
a )Tj
29.794 0 Td
(conditional)Tj
-46.985 -0.933 Td
(use permit for the construction of a new public safety )Tj
21.604 0 Td
(building.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
3.584 0 Td
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
(We )Tj
(affirm.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
-25.188 -0.933 Td
( )Tj
EMC
0.011 Tw 2.667 -0.933 Td
[(The City of Barre received )0.7(a )]TJ
0.018 Tw [(conditional )0.8(use permit )0.5(from the City\222s development )0.8(review board \(DRB\) for )]TJ
0 Tw (construction of)Tj
-2.667 -0.933 Td
(a new public safety building.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
11.581 0 Td
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
(The City proposed to locate the building )Tj
16.914 0 Td
(between Fourth and Fifth Streets, one block east of North)Tj
-28.494 -0.933 Td
(Main Street, in a )Tj
6.915 0 Td
(planned residential zoning district.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
13.83 0 Td
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
0.03 Tw [(Appellants )0.9(appealed )1.1(the )0.7(DRB\222s decision )0.9(to )0.5(the )0.7(environmental )1.5(court, )0.7(which)]TJ
0 Tw -20.745 -0.933 Td
(conducted a de novo hearing.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
0 -0.933 TD
( )Tj
EMC
0.067 Tw 2.667 -0.933 Td
[(At the )0.7(environmental )1.4(court, )]TJ
0.085 Tw 11.569 0 Td
[(appellants )1(contended )0.7(that )0.7(the )0.5(DRB\222s decision )0.6(impaired )1(their )0.6(vested )0.5(rights in )]TJ
0.067 Tw [(parking )0.6(along)]TJ
0.133 Tw -14.236 -0.933 Td
(Fourth Street.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
0.153 Tw [(They claimed )1(that )0.5(their )0.6(property interest )0.7(in parking on Fourth Street )0.6(arose from a 1990 zoning permit )0.7(they)]TJ
0 Tw T*
(received.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
3.636 0 Td
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
0.007 Tw [(Appellants )0.8(argued )0.6(that )0.9(the )0.6(conditional )1.3(use permit )1(took )0.5(their )0.8(vested )]TJ
0.017 Tw 27.448 0 Td
[(property )0.6(rights )0.5(from )0.5(them )0.8(unlawfully.)]TJ
0 Tw /Span<>> BDC
15.258 0 Td
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
0.067 Tw (In addition,)Tj
0.074 Tw -46.343 -0.933 Td
[(appellants )0.7(contested )0.6(the City\222s claim )0.8(that the project )0.5(met )]TJ
0.08 Tw [(the conditional )0.9(use criteria )1(set forth in the City\222s zoning ordinance.)]TJ
0 Tw /Span<>> BDC
51.23 0 Td
( )Tj
EMC
0.314 Tw -51.23 -0.933 Td
(After performing a site visit with the )Tj
0.315 Tw [(parties and considering the evidence )0.6(offered and admitted )0.8(into the record, the)]TJ
0.18 Tw T*
[(environmental )1.1(court concluded )0.6(that )0.5(the project )0.7(met the requirement )1(for )]TJ
0.178 Tw [(conditional )1.2(use so long as the )0.5(City )0.6(abided )0.7(by the)]TJ
0 Tw 0 -0.933 TD
(permit\222s conditions.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
7.999 0 Td
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
(This appeal followed.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
-7.999 -0.933 Td
( )Tj
EMC
0.05 Tw 2.667 -1.867 Td
[(Appellants )0.5(reassert their )0.5(argument )]TJ
0.067 Tw 14.195 0 Td
[(that )0.8(the )0.7(conditional )1.3(use permit )1(impaired )1.1(their )0.8(vested )0.7(property )0.6(rights )0.5(in )0.5(parking )]TJ
0 Tw 32.403 0 Td
(along)Tj
0.217 Tw -49.265 -0.933 Td
[(the )0.7(portion )0.6(of Fourth Street )0.8(that )0.8(abuts )0.5(their )0.8(property.)]TJ
0.2 Tw /Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
0.233 Tw (The City argues that we may not consider )Tj
0.222 Tw (the issue because the)Tj
0.163 Tw 0 -0.933 TD
[(environmental )1.1(court did not decide )0.7(it, concluding )0.7(that )0.5(it )]TJ
0.167 Tw [(lacked )0.9(subject )0.9(matter )1.1(jurisdiction )1.2(over )0.5(the )0.6(question.)]TJ
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
0.133 Tw (Because the)Tj
0.033 Tw 0 -0.933 TD
[(environmental )0.8(court did not )]TJ
0.052 Tw (rule on the issue of appellants\222 claim of vested rights, the only iss\
ue properly )Tj
0.044 Tw [(before us )-0.6(is whether)]TJ
0 -0.933 TD
(the court correctly decided the jurisdictional )Tj
0 Tw 18.204 0 Td
(question.)Tj
0.033 Tw /Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
0.05 Tw [(Appellants )0.5(do not provide )]TJ
0.067 Tw [(an )0.5(argument )1(on that )0.9(question, )0.6(and )0.5(this )0.5(Court)]TJ
0.044 Tw -18.204 -0.933 Td
[(does not address issues )-0.6(that are )]TJ
0 Tw (not briefed.)Tj
0.033 Tw /Span<>> BDC
17.595 0 Td
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
(In re Dunnett)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 220.3219 300 cm
0 0 m
60.73 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 Tw 11.25 0 0 11.25 281.0518 300.75 Tm
(, )Tj
0.067 Tw 0.567 0 Td
(172 Vt. 196, 203 n.* \(2001\).)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
[(Therefore, )1(we express no opinion )0.7(on)]TJ
0.147 Tw -24.127 -0.933 Td
[(appellants\222 )1.1(claim )1.2(of vested )0.7(rights )]TJ
0.156 Tw 14.257 0 Td
[(because )0.9(it )0.8(is not )0.6(properly )0.8(before )0.8(us.)]TJ
0.133 Tw /Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
0 Tw (See )Tj
0.167 Tw 17.773 0 Td
(Fyles v. Schmidt)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 376.338 289.5 cm
0 0 m
79.693 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0.173 Tw 11.25 0 0 11.25 456.031 290.25 Tm
(, 141 Vt. 419, 422-23 \(1982\))Tj
0 Tw -39.114 -0.933 Td
(\(\223Issues not )Tj
(ruled on by the trial court cannot be raised for the first time on )Tj
30.213 0 Td
(appeal.\224\).)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
-30.213 -0.933 Td
( )Tj
EMC
2.667 -0.933 Td
(Appellants next argue that the )Tj
12.246 0 Td
(environmental court\222s findings and conclusions are contrary to the re\
cord )Tj
29.602 0 Td
(evidence and that)Tj
0.083 Tw -44.514 -0.933 Td
(the court misapplied the law.)Tj
0.067 Tw /Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
0.08 Tw [(We review the environmental )1.1(court\222s )]TJ
0.089 Tw [(findings for clear )0.7(error.)]TJ
0.1 Tw /Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
0 Tw (Findings )Tj
0.1 Tw 42.193 0 Td
[(will stand on appeal )0.6(if)]TJ
0.18 Tw -42.193 -0.933 Td
[(there )0.5(is any credibl)0.6(e evidence )0.7(in the record to support )]TJ
0 Tw (them.)Tj
0.167 Tw /Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
[(In re )0.5(Gulli)]TJ
ET
q 1 0 0 1 315.213 237 cm
0 0 m
50.612 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0.178 Tw 11.25 0 0 11.25 365.8252 237.75 Tm
(, 174 Vt. )Tj
0.2 Tw (580, 582 \(2002\) \(mem.\).)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
14.715 0 Td
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
(The court\222s)Tj
0.105 Tw -45.81 -0.933 Td
[(interpretation )1.5(of a zoning )0.6(ordinance )0.8(will be upheld )0.6(absent )0.5(a showing that )0.7(it )0.5(is )]TJ
0.1 Tw [(arbitrary, )0.6(capricious, )0.6(or based on an irrational)]TJ
0 Tw 0 -0.933 TD
(reading of the law.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
7.497 0 Td
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
(In re Bennington Sch., Inc.)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 105.967 216 cm
0 0 m
121.536 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 227.5033 216.75 Tm
(, 2004 )Tj
(VT 6, \266 11, 176 Vt. 584 \(mem.\).)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
-18.8 -0.933 Td
( )Tj
EMC
0.12 Tw 2.667 -0.933 Td
[(Appellants )0.5(claim )0.8(that )0.5(the court )]TJ
0.118 Tw [(erred by concluding )0.7(that )0.5(the project )0.6(will not adversely )0.5(affect )0.7(traffic )0.7(in the )]TJ
0.133 Tw (area or the)Tj
-2.667 -0.933 Td
(area\222s character.)Tj
0.2 Tw /Span<>> BDC
6.683 0 Td
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
0 Tw (In )Tj
0.2 Tw 2.183 0 Td
[(addition, )0.7(appellants )0.7(argue that )0.5(community )0.8(facilities )1.2(along Fourth and Main )]TJ
(Streets will be adversely)Tj
0.011 Tw -8.866 -0.933 Td
[(affected )0.6(by the new public safety facility.)]TJ
0 Tw /Span<>> BDC
16.643 0 Td
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
0.01 Tw [(The )0.8(court )0.8(determined )1.4(that )1(traffic )1(in )0.7(the )]TJ
0.017 Tw 16.365 0 Td
[(area )0.8(will )0.6(not )0.5(be )0.5(adversely )0.8(affected )1.1(by the )0.6(new)]TJ
0.08 Tw -33.008 -0.933 Td
[(facility )1(because Fourth Street )0.5(is )]TJ
0.087 Tw [(capable )0.6(of handling the emergency )0.6(traffic )0.5(that will occur after the facility )0.8(is )]TJ
0 Tw (built.)Tj
0.067 Tw /Span<>> BDC
47.044 0 Td
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
0.1 Tw (As to the)Tj
0.022 Tw -47.044 -0.933 Td
[(character )0.7(of the )]TJ
0.028 Tw [(area, )0.6(the )0.6(court )0.5(found that )0.8(the )0.5(surrounding neighborhood )0.5(contains )0.7(a mix )0.6(of )]TJ
0.017 Tw [(residential )1.3(and )0.5(commercial )1.6(uses, and)]TJ
0.083 Tw 0 -0.933 TD
[(that the aesthetics )0.5(of the new building are )]TJ
0.086 Tw [(attractive )1.5(and )0.5(compatible )1.4(with the )0.6(downtown Barre )0.5(area.)]TJ
0.1 Tw /Span<>> BDC
40.863 0 Td
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
(The court also found no)Tj
0 Tw -40.863 -0.933 Td
(adverse impact )Tj
0.024 Tw 6.275 0 Td
[(on appellants\222 property and other facilities )0.8(in the area from the project.)]TJ
0 Tw /Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
0.04 Tw [(Appellants )0.5(have ample )0.6(parking for their)]TJ
0.096 Tw -6.275 -0.933 Td
[(tenants even if no parking is permitted )0.6(along Fourth Street.)]TJ
0.1 Tw /Span<>> BDC
24.473 0 Td
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
(All of those findings and conclusions )Tj
0.117 Tw [(are )0.6(well )0.7(supported )0.5(by the)]TJ
0 Tw -24.473 -0.933 Td
(evidence in the record, and we find no arbitrary or )Tj
20.353 0 Td
(capricious application of the law in this case.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
17.994 0 Td
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
(No error appears.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
-38.347 -0.933 Td
( )Tj
EMC
0.013 Tw 2.667 -0.933 Td
(Finally, appellants contend that the )Tj
0.028 Tw [(proceedings )0.7(below were tainted )1.1(by the )0.5(City\222s conflict )1(of interest )0.8(in reviewing )]TJ
0 Tw 45.887 0 Td
(its own)Tj
-48.554 -0.933 Td
(application for a conditional use permit.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
15.995 0 Td
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
0.011 Tw [(The City argues that appellants )0.7(never )]TJ
0.022 Tw [(raised this claim )0.6(before the environmental )0.9(court.)]TJ
0 Tw /Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
0.013 Tw -15.995 -0.933 Td
(Appellants have not demonstrated that )Tj
0.015 Tw (they preserved this issue for our review by raising it before the enviro\
nmental )Tj
0 Tw 47.253 0 Td
(court.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
(See)Tj
0.067 Tw -47.253 -0.933 Td
(V.R.A.P. 28\(a\)\(4\) )Tj
0.091 Tw [(\(appellant\222s )0.9(brief must explain )0.7(how issues were presented )0.5(below and preserved )]TJ
0.089 Tw [(for appellate )1.2(review\); )]TJ
0 Tw 49.606 0 Td
(New)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 574.0681 58.5 cm
0 0 m
21.242 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0.111 Tw 11.25 0 0 11.25 16 48.75 Tm
(England P\222ship v. Rutland City Sch. Dist.)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 48 cm
0 0 m
195.317 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0.1 Tw 11.25 0 0 11.25 211.3168 48.75 Tm
(, 173 )Tj
0.121 Tw [(Vt. 69, 73 \(2001\) \(absent an indication )0.8(that appellant\222s )0.6(argument was raised)]TJ
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 Tw 11.25 0 0 11.25 16 38.25 Tm
(below, the matter may not be heard on appeal\).)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
18.826 0 Td
( )Tj
EMC
( )Tj
(We therefore do not consider the )Tj
13.883 0 Td
(argument.)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
22 0 obj
<>
endobj
23 0 obj
(9l,j)
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
[/ICCBased 32 0 R]
endobj
32 0 obj
<>stream
Hb``$WR~|@T#2S/`M.(*(%8H8c-
fԉd9@6_IjH9(3=DR1%?)U!$5X3/9 ($5j%V*'&*r" (,!!0b;CҢ2(ɘ I8/
endstream
endobj
28 0 obj
[/ICCBased 33 0 R]
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
HyTSwoɞc
[5laQIBHADED2mtFOE.c}088GNg9w߽ '0 ֠Jb
2y.-;!KZ ^i"L0-
@8(r;q7Ly&Qq4j|9
V)gB0iW8#8wթ8_٥ʨQQj@&A)/g>'K t;\
ӥ$պFZUn(4T%)뫔0C&Zi8bxEB;Pӓ̹Aom?W=
x- [ 0}y)7ta>jT7@tܛ`q2ʀ&6ZLĄ?_yxg)˔zçLU*uSkSeO4?c. R
߁-25 S>ӣVd`rn~Y&+`;A4 A9 =-tl`;~p Gp| [`L`< "AYA+Cb(R, *T2B-
ꇆnQt}MA0alSx k&^>0|>_',G!"F$H:R!zFQd?r9\A&GrQhE]a4zBgE#H *B=0HIpp0MxJ$D1D, VĭKĻYdE"EI2EBGt4MzNr!YK ?%_(0J:EAiQ(()ӔWT6U@P+!~mDeԴ!hӦh/']B/ҏӿ?a0nhF!X8܌kc&5S6lIa2cKMA!E#ƒdV(kel
}}Cq9
N')].uJr
wG xR^[oƜchg`>b$*~ :Eb~,m,-ݖ,Y¬*6X[ݱF=3뭷Y~dó tizf6~`{v.Ng#{}}jc1X6fm;'_9 r:8q:˜O:ϸ8uJqnv=MmR 4
n3ܣkGݯz=[==<=GTB(/S,]6*-W:#7*e^YDY}UjAyT`#D="b{ų+ʯ:!kJ4Gmt}uC%K7YVfFY.=b?SƕƩȺy
چk5%4m7lqlioZlG+Zzmzy]?uuw|"űNwW&e֥ﺱ*|j5kyݭǯg^ykEklD_p߶7Dmo꿻1ml{Mś
nLl<9O [$h՛BdҞ@iءG&vVǥ8nRĩ7u\ЭD- u`ֲK³8%yhYѹJº;.!
zpg_XQKFAǿ=ȼ:ɹ8ʷ6˶5̵5͵6ζ7ϸ9к<Ѿ?DINU\dlvۀ܊ݖޢ)߯6DScs
2F[p(@Xr4Pm8Ww)Km
endstream
endobj
14 0 obj
<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 1/Type/Page>>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(Note: Decisions of a three-justice panel are not to be considered as pre\
cedent before any tribunal)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///C/Users/acamp/Documents/MHT/eo04-368.htm)Tj
21.746 0 Td
([3/13/2017 12:43:58 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
/CS0 cs 1 scn
10 568.5 591.75 197.249 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 scn
/Span<>> BDC
11.25 0 0 11.25 16 756 Tm
( )Tj
EMC
ET
Q
BT
0 scn
11.25 0 0 11.25 46 745.5 Tm
(Affirmed)Tj
ET
/CS0 CS 0 SCN
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 46 744.75 cm
0 0 m
41.858 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 87.8579 745.5 Tm
(.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
-6.387 -0.933 Td
( )Tj
EMC
/Span<>> BDC
0 -0.933 TD
( )Tj
EMC
/Span<>> BDC
0 -0.933 TD
( )Tj
EMC
19.2 -0.933 Td
(BY THE COURT:)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
-19.2 -0.933 Td
( )Tj
EMC
/Span<>> BDC
T*
( )Tj
EMC
/Span<>> BDC
T*
( )Tj
EMC
19.2 -0.933 Td
(_______________________________________)Tj
T*
(Paul L. Reiber, Chief )Tj
8.776 0 Td
(Justice)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
/Span<>> BDC
12 0 0 12 232 640.5 Tm
( )Tj
EMC
/TT0 1 Tf
11.25 0 0 11.25 232 629.25 Tm
(_______________________________________)Tj
T*
(Denise R. Johnson)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 316.0619 618.75 Tm
(, Associate Justice)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
/Span<>> BDC
11.25 0 0 11.25 16 607.5 Tm
( )Tj
EMC
19.2 -0.933 Td
(_______________________________________)Tj
0 -0.933 TD
(Frederic W. Allen, Chief Justice )Tj
13.19 0 Td
(\(Ret.\),)Tj
-13.19 -0.933 Td
(Specially )Tj
3.971 0 Td
(Assigned)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
35 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H\݊0s^X* Ka} M6~'Itd7Kkf١QpN"xՆsPZ.[Iܭǩ5̄ IŻ62:mn-nNh]oDFqU14_~$ʆQzD
q!>#S!E:/yqH||J|
|N||ILfD0_'-`,Xᙋ;GkYM~ A8
endstream
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
HV}TS@`Ծ
J
Am%@h2Xg8wVOu]uzi3xUשEں]欐=&p_{s